Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sally Jaxx (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Bucks Fizz (band). Courcelles 21:46, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sally Jaxx
AfDs for this article:
- Sally Jaxx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was just listed at AFD and closed as redirect but it turns out the article was never tagged with the AFD notice so I have voided the close and relisted. Details and rationale for listing in AFD1. Spartaz Humbug! 16:22, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I can see why the page as of October caused some offence to (self confessed) Bucks Fizz fan User:Tuzapicabit. However since then I’ve updated it quite a lot. While I confess that her notability is a little borderline, but she is on the right side of it (see Talk:Sally Jaxx for more). --Trappedinburnley (talk) 17:26, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is actually the venue that will decide on notability so you need to post the argument here or it might otherwise get overlooked in the close. Actual sources are what are most sorely needed here. Spartaz Humbug! 17:36, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The main thrust of my argument is that someone with 5800ish (admittedly mainly trivial) Google results, should be entitled to a small article at least. I think the YouTube clips certainly imply she has a few fans . I also should state that my only connection to Miss Jaxx is the town we are both from (if I’m completely honest I didn’t have a clue who she was when I first found the page while populating the People from Burnley category). --Trappedinburnley (talk) 18:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is actually the venue that will decide on notability so you need to post the argument here or it might otherwise get overlooked in the close. Actual sources are what are most sorely needed here. Spartaz Humbug! 17:36, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 18:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Bucks Fizz (band)#Line-up changes. I see no notability outside her band. google hits alone are meaningless, what is the content in the results. Youtube implying interest is not the same as being notable. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:49, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Bucks Fizz (band)#Line-up changes. Nice try attempting to rescue the article, but I stand by what I said last time. The odd article in the local paper isn't enough. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 18:37, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sally_Jaxx_(2nd_nomination)&oldid=1069633922"