Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SM City Bacoor (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:47, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SM City Bacoor

SM City Bacoor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced . Fails WP:ORG shopping malls are not inherently notable LibStar (talk) 09:30, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:22, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:22, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:22, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:59, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:PROMO; the article exists to promote the business. WP:DIRECTORY also applies. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete actually there is a wrote the article because written claim the WP:VERIFY the mall it should be no given the sourced past year. Oripaypaykim (talk) 03:21, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.