Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robotboy (character) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Robotboy. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:55, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Robotboy (character)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is comprised mostly of original research and personal interpretation, a la a typical Wikia.com article. The uncontroversial information that remains could easily be incorporated into the main article, Robotboy or List of Robotboy characters. Article also meanders and becomes in effect a duplicate list of characters. A unique article is not warranted for this character. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:15, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 21:07, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to back to Robotboy per previous AfD consensus. Semi/fully protect Redirect if needed.Martin451 21:38, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Robotboy. I concur that protection may be necessary. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:48, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect I agree with the above. Cogito-Ergo-Sum (14) (talk) 01:35, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.