Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Eccleshall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. by User:SouthernNights as WP:A7, G5. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Eccleshall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ran a department at a minor university, which is probably not sufficient grounds to consider this academic notable. Salimfadhley (talk) 00:52, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete G5 as one of the slew of poor articles created by socks of banned editor Novonium. But apart from that ... QUB as a Russell Group university is not "minor" so the nomination is misleading. PamD 02:37, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

His books look solid, lots of holdings in Worldcat, though the original article creator never bothers with little details like publisher, date, isbn. I could probably improve this article but don't want to spend my time to give a sockpuppet the satisfaction of seeing "their" article survive in the encyclopedia. Delete for now, without prejudice to future recreation by an editor with better article-creation habits. PamD 11:59, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:45, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.