Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redbank Plaza (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Redbank, Queensland#Amenities. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:37, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redbank Plaza

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined the PROD since it was deleted at AfD, but the concerns raised there still remain and a BEFORE shows no coverage to indicate this is a notable mall. It exists, but this is a borderline A7 if not for the prior AfD Star Mississippi 22:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls, Organizations, Companies, and Australia. Star Mississippi 22:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Courtesy ping MarchOfTheGreyhounds as PRODder and @Canley: as prior, still active. I'm not PINGing TPH as I believe he's ARBCOM restricted, but if I'm wrong someone is welcome to ping him as I'm certainly not avoiding notification Star Mississippi 22:10, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Collingwood Park, Queensland - clear alternative to deletion, the shopping centre is already mentioned in that article. Deus et lex (talk) 23:10, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no substantial coverage of the shopping centre itself. I'm not convinced of the value of redirecting to preserve this unsourced content. --MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 09:49, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - you also haven't put forward any reason why it's inappropriate - "not convinced" is a pretty spurious reason. In particular, it's not the same as the name of the suburb so not an obvious indication of where it is. Deus et lex (talk) 03:05, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unsourced and nothing significant in terms of independent coverage. Just another run of the mill shopping centre. Ajf773 (talk) 09:19, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Redbank, Queensland#Amenities as a more precise WP:ATD. I sourced the sentence describing the mall in both my proposed target and Deus's proposed target so there should be no issue there for a redirect. Jumpytoo Talk 19:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I am comfortable with this proposal. Deus et lex (talk) 11:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.