Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pressat (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 05:54, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pressat

Pressat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, appears no more notable than at the 2013 AFD. The problem is that there's no significant coverage of the company. The only things actually about Pressat all appear to be sourced to the same 2013 announcement that they accept Bitcoin, with no further coverage. The good-looking references from The Guardian, LA Times, and CBS News all cite a survey from the company about coffee drinking with no WP:SIGCOV of the actual company. ~ A412 ^talk! 03:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Companies, and United Kingdom. ~ A412 ^talk! 03:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:15, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already at AFD so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:50, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: A recent new article about a PR distribution firm. I gave a "delete" opinion in the 2013 AfD deletion; looking at this new article instance, neither the 2013 announcement-based coverage about accepting Bitcoin nor the 2014 item about fraudsters issuing fake invoices for their work rises above trivial coverage, nor does the coffee-drinking survey. Clearly a company going about its business in its chosen sector, but searches are not finding evidence of notability. A redirect to the article on the GlobeNewswire parent could be an ATD, though Pressat is not mentioned there. AllyD (talk) 14:07, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.