Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poem-'bicycle'

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SNOW DGG (talk) 12:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poem-'bicycle'

Poem-'bicycle' (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Either someone posting their own poem, which Wikipedia is not for, or someone posting someone else's poem, in which case we can delete as a copyright infringement. I don't think any speedy criteria apply, though. -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 14:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I am also nominating:

Poem-'one dark night' (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Delete. I can't think of any speedy categories, either; the poetry at least makes some sense, and it would be stretching the no context criterion to cover this. But this is a source text from a non-notable poet. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There isn't any reason to have a page for this poem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.229.168 (talk) 14:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both Non-notable poems that fail the GNG at the very least. --GedUK  15:08, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both articles WP:NOTE;WP:LIT cf38^talk 15:11, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and the author can post the poem on a poetry page, or Facebook, or something. It's a nice poem. Northwestgnome (talk) 16:05, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete both. Wikipedia is not a aplace to post your own poems. Apparently the author doesn't get it. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment, well it is a brand new user, please don't bite them, they're probably not knowledgeable of Wikipedia policy yet. -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 18:25, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete but Lilac, you are a kind soul. Drmies (talk) 19:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's hard not to bite; an online encyclopedia normally is not the place for someone to display their poems. Mandsford (talk) 20:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete A1-speedy or per above. The Rolling Camel (talk) 11:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.