Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Sánchez de la Hoz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor 15:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro Sánchez de la Hoz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO, as sources do not prove notability. Kirbanzo (talk) 14:07, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:51, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:51, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:51, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I added some references. He has been written about as secretary to Pizarro and for writing an important account of the Spanish conquest of the Incan empire, as well as for his later misadventures with Valdivia. 24.151.116.12 (talk) 14:55, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Seems like a suitable subject for an article. It passes WP:V, WP:NPOV, and WP:NOR for sure. Smmurphy^(Talk) 15:04, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Certainly keep -- Both a leading conquistador and a chronicler he was clearly important. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:35, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: notability is sufficiently demonstrated in the current version of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:27, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: a quick search in the Spanish version of the article, where there is more scrutiny, supports the importance that is argued for here. Dentren | ^Talk 02:53, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.