Please note that if you post something for me here, put this page on your watch list -- I'll respond to it here.
If I posted on your talk page, you can reply on your talk page and I'll be watching your page.
This makes it easier for both of us to keep everything in context.
Thanks.
You could change the name of the article about the Chilean military dictatorship by its old name, since the user, since I do not know how to do it. I would greatly appreciate your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.83.208.210 (talk) 18:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: To opt out from receiving future newsletters, please click here for instructions.
Project News
Potential upcoming project page changes by WikiProject X. Category discussions at CfD. (more below)
WikiProject X may begin pilot testing to refine WikiProject Food and Drink's project's pages. A recent discussion regarding this occurred at the project talk page here.
During September–October 2015, several food and drink categories have been discussed at Categories for discussion. Notices for these discussions are sometimes posted at the project's talk page. Notice about a new discussion was recently posted at the project talk page on 8 November 2015.
There are presently 3,658unassessed Food and drink articles. Assistance in reducing this number would be appreciated.
Please see the project's Tasks and To do sections for project and article tasks, and please update the lists by adding new entries and removing resolved or outdated ones.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Curabitur pretium tincidunt lacus. Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida. Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Donec lobortis risus a elit. Etiam tempor. Ut ullamcorper, ligula eu tempor congue, eros est euismod turpis, id tincidunt sapien risus a quam. Maecenas fermentum consequat mi. Donec fermentum. Pellentesque malesuada nulla a mi. Duis sapien sem, aliquet nec, commodo eget, consequat quis, neque. Aliquam faucibus, elit ut dictum aliquet, felis nisl adipiscing sapien, sed malesuada diam lacus eget erat. Cras mollis scelerisque nunc. Nullam arcu. Aliquam consequat. Curabitur augue lorem, dapibus quis, laoreet et, pretium ac, nisi. Aenean magna nisl, mollis quis, molestie eu, feugiat in, orci. In hac habitasse platea dictumst.
Fusce convallis, mauris imperdiet gravida bibendum, nisl turpis suscipit mauris, sed placerat ipsum urna sed risus. In convallis tellus a mauris. Curabitur non elit ut libero tristique sodales. Mauris a lacus. Donec mattis semper leo. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Vivamus facilisis diam at odio. Mauris dictum, nisi eget consequat elementum, lacus ligula molestie metus, non feugiat orci magna ac sem. Donec turpis. Donec vitae metus. Morbi tristique neque eu mauris. Quisque gravida ipsum non sapien. Proin turpis lacus, scelerisque vitae, elementum at, lobortis ac, quam. Aliquam dictum eleifend risus. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Etiam sit amet diam. Suspendisse odio. Suspendisse nunc. In semper bibendum libero.
Proin nonummy, lacus eget pulvinar lacinia, pede felis dignissim leo, vitae tristique magna lacus sit amet eros. Nullam ornare. Praesent odio ligula, dapibus sed, tincidunt eget, dictum ac, nibh. Nam quis lacus. Nunc eleifend molestie velit. Morbi lobortis quam eu velit. Donec euismod vestibulum massa. Donec non lectus. Aliquam commodo lacus sit amet nulla. Cras dignissim elit et augue. Nullam non diam. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Aenean vestibulum. Sed lobortis elit quis lectus. Nunc sed lacus at augue bibendum dapibus.
Feel free to welcome the new members who have recently joined the project.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ETA (separatist group), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Mundo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination for merging of Template:Extinct volcanoes of the Andes
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Juan Garland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cabildo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for February 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for February 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Formal mediation has been requested
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Undue weight and original research in the Causes of the War of the Pacific". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 8 March 2016.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 17:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Góngora
Hello, about this Góngora thing. The problem is not necessarily that other persons may bear that name as well, but the question is whether they are referred to as Góngora. I must admit I don't know the poet, but when I run an internet search on Góngora, the vast majority of results are related to the poet and not any other person. In Wikipedia terms that would be called the primary topic, if you are familiar with the concept. That's also the way it was set up before you modified the page. Do you therefore have anything substantial which could motivate a change of primary topic? If you do, I would suggest we revert the name to its original redirect, and file a WP:RM request so that other editors could judge if a change of primary topic is appropriate. Rgds, --Midas02 (talk) 19:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter – March 2016
There are presently 3,575 unassessed articles. Additional attention from the project's assessors is necessary and would be appreciated to reduce this backlog.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Curabitur pretium tincidunt lacus. Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida. Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Donec lobortis risus a elit. Etiam tempor. Ut ullamcorper, ligula eu tempor congue, eros est euismod turpis, id tincidunt sapien risus a quam. Maecenas fermentum consequat mi. Donec fermentum. Pellentesque malesuada nulla a mi. Duis sapien sem, aliquet nec, commodo eget, consequat quis, neque. Aliquam faucibus, elit ut dictum aliquet, felis nisl adipiscing sapien, sed malesuada diam lacus eget erat. Cras mollis scelerisque nunc. Nullam arcu. Aliquam consequat. Curabitur augue lorem, dapibus quis, laoreet et, pretium ac, nisi. Aenean magna nisl, mollis quis, molestie eu, feugiat in, orci. In hac habitasse platea dictumst.
Fusce convallis, mauris imperdiet gravida bibendum, nisl turpis suscipit mauris, sed placerat ipsum urna sed risus. In convallis tellus a mauris. Curabitur non elit ut libero tristique sodales. Mauris a lacus. Donec mattis semper leo. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Vivamus facilisis diam at odio. Mauris dictum, nisi eget consequat elementum, lacus ligula molestie metus, non feugiat orci magna ac sem. Donec turpis. Donec vitae metus. Morbi tristique neque eu mauris. Quisque gravida ipsum non sapien. Proin turpis lacus, scelerisque vitae, elementum at, lobortis ac, quam. Aliquam dictum eleifend risus. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Etiam sit amet diam. Suspendisse odio. Suspendisse nunc. In semper bibendum libero.
Proin nonummy, lacus eget pulvinar lacinia, pede felis dignissim leo, vitae tristique magna lacus sit amet eros. Nullam ornare. Praesent odio ligula, dapibus sed, tincidunt eget, dictum ac, nibh. Nam quis lacus. Nunc eleifend molestie velit. Morbi lobortis quam eu velit. Donec euismod vestibulum massa. Donec non lectus. Aliquam commodo lacus sit amet nulla. Cras dignissim elit et augue. Nullam non diam. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Aenean vestibulum. Sed lobortis elit quis lectus. Nunc sed lacus at augue bibendum dapibus.
Feel free to welcome the new members who have recently joined the project.
Olive Oil Times (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Janestreet350 (talk·contribs· new pages (1)) started on 2016-02-22, score: 20
Terra Greens Organic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Neetjash (talk·contribs· new pages (2)) started on 2016-02-19, score: 10
Brian Petruzzi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by PorridgeJohnson1 (talk·contribs· new pages (1)) started on 2016-02-25, score: 20
The request for formal mediation concerning Undue weight and original research in the Causes of the War of the Pacific, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited José Antonio Pareja, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Cape St Vincent. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter – April 2016
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Curabitur pretium tincidunt lacus. Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida. Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Donec lobortis risus a elit. Etiam tempor. Ut ullamcorper, ligula eu tempor congue, eros est euismod turpis, id tincidunt sapien risus a quam. Maecenas fermentum consequat mi. Donec fermentum. Pellentesque malesuada nulla a mi. Duis sapien sem, aliquet nec, commodo eget, consequat quis, neque. Aliquam faucibus, elit ut dictum aliquet, felis nisl adipiscing sapien, sed malesuada diam lacus eget erat. Cras mollis scelerisque nunc. Nullam arcu. Aliquam consequat. Curabitur augue lorem, dapibus quis, laoreet et, pretium ac, nisi. Aenean magna nisl, mollis quis, molestie eu, feugiat in, orci. In hac habitasse platea dictumst.
Fusce convallis, mauris imperdiet gravida bibendum, nisl turpis suscipit mauris, sed placerat ipsum urna sed risus. In convallis tellus a mauris. Curabitur non elit ut libero tristique sodales. Mauris a lacus. Donec mattis semper leo. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Vivamus facilisis diam at odio. Mauris dictum, nisi eget consequat elementum, lacus ligula molestie metus, non feugiat orci magna ac sem. Donec turpis. Donec vitae metus. Morbi tristique neque eu mauris. Quisque gravida ipsum non sapien. Proin turpis lacus, scelerisque vitae, elementum at, lobortis ac, quam. Aliquam dictum eleifend risus. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Etiam sit amet diam. Suspendisse odio. Suspendisse nunc. In semper bibendum libero.
Proin nonummy, lacus eget pulvinar lacinia, pede felis dignissim leo, vitae tristique magna lacus sit amet eros. Nullam ornare. Praesent odio ligula, dapibus sed, tincidunt eget, dictum ac, nibh. Nam quis lacus. Nunc eleifend molestie velit. Morbi lobortis quam eu velit. Donec euismod vestibulum massa. Donec non lectus. Aliquam commodo lacus sit amet nulla. Cras dignissim elit et augue. Nullam non diam. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Aenean vestibulum. Sed lobortis elit quis lectus. Nunc sed lacus at augue bibendum dapibus.
Feel free to welcome the new members who have recently joined the project.
Indian Tea Association (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Rohanrafaroger (talk·contribs· new pages (1)) started on 2016-03-30, score: 10
Tops Pizza (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Edwardx (talk·contribs· new pages (51)) started on 2016-03-30, score: 20
Kaspa's (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Edwardx (talk·contribs· new pages (51)) started on 2016-03-29, score: 20
William S. Bloxsom-Carter (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Kcwatson55 (talk·contribs· new pages (1)) started on 2016-03-25, score: 20
Margot Henderson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Gareth E. Kegg (talk ·contribs· new pages (25)) started on 2016-03-25, score: 10
Sam's Chicken (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Edwardx (talk·contribs· new pages (51)) started on 2016-03-25, score: 10
Deep Fried Oreo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Cla1402group4 (talk·contribs· new pages (1)) started on 2016-03-24, score: 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pedro de Villagra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ávila. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate
Hi
Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. We welcome you to have a look. Feel free to participate.
You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:
Publish an article to the journal.
Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
Apply to become the treasurer of the journal
Join the editorial board.
Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updateswijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org.
Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.
The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.
-from Diptanshu.D(talk·contribs· count) and others of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.
Forum of Indian Food Importers (FIFI) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Bangaji (talk·contribs· new pages (2)) started on 2016-07-28, score: 20
Milton L. Banks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Dbanks1112 (talk·contribs· new pages (1)) started on 2016-08-06, score: 10
SuperMeat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by KDS4444 (talk·contribs· new pages (1)) started on 2016-07-31, score: 20
Abu Talib Urban Farmer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Adjoajo (talk·contribs· new pages (2)) started on 2016-08-04, score: 10
Fisherman's Basket (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Rain and Keet (talk·contribs· new pages (5)) started on 2016-08-04, score: 20
Forum of Indian Food Importers (FIFI) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Bangaji (talk·contribs· new pages (2)) started on 2016-07-28, score: 20
Milton L. Banks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Dbanks1112 (talk·contribs· new pages (1)) started on 2016-08-06, score: 10
SuperMeat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by KDS4444 (talk·contribs· new pages (1)) started on 2016-07-31, score: 20
Abu Talib Urban Farmer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Adjoajo (talk·contribs· new pages (2)) started on 2016-08-04, score: 10
Fisherman's Basket (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Rain and Keet (talk·contribs· new pages (5)) started on 2016-08-04, score: 20
Note: To opt out from receiving future newsletters, please click here for instructions.
Project News
Good article Nominations, Project Updates
Note: Our members page design has been tweaked so that members can easily see newsletter-receiving members. We also updated the format of adding your name (i.e. please use {{Mailing list member}} instead on {{user}}. See the page for yourself for more information!
The following articles were promoted to GA status!
Forum of Indian Food Importers (FIFI) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Bangaji (talk·contribs· new pages (2)) started on 2016-07-28, score: 20
Milton L. Banks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Dbanks1112 (talk·contribs· new pages (1)) started on 2016-08-06, score: 10
SuperMeat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by KDS4444 (talk·contribs· new pages (1)) started on 2016-07-31, score: 20
Abu Talib Urban Farmer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Adjoajo (talk·contribs· new pages (2)) started on 2016-08-04, score: 10
Fisherman's Basket (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Rain and Keet (talk·contribs· new pages (5)) started on 2016-08-04, score: 20
Note: To opt out from receiving future newsletters, please click here for instructions.
Project News
Project Updates
We have opened a Twitter account, '@WikiProjectFD. It will keep members to stay ahead of minor updates and will show articles for improvement each week. More information can be seen here!
We are creating a watchlist for all articles under the project's scope. If you have seen an article under our scope that hasn't been added to Category:Food Watchlist Articles, please help us by adding the category!
The finished watchlist will show here.
Some do's to do..
Please see the project's Tasks and To do sections for project and article tasks, and feel free to update the lists with new entries.
Please add all food/drink-related pictures on Wikimedia Commons to the project's categories.
Note: Any Project Coordinators can help with the Twitter account. EmailingWikiPancake will give him/her access to the account.
Help us out by...
Assessing unassessed articles. As of September 27, 2016, there are currently about 3,700 unassessed articles!
Forum of Indian Food Importers (FIFI) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Bangaji (talk·contribs· new pages (2)) started on 2016-07-28, score: 20
Milton L. Banks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Dbanks1112 (talk·contribs· new pages (1)) started on 2016-08-06, score: 10
SuperMeat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by KDS4444 (talk·contribs· new pages (1)) started on 2016-07-31, score: 20
Abu Talib Urban Farmer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Adjoajo (talk·contribs· new pages (2)) started on 2016-08-04, score: 10
Fisherman's Basket (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Rain and Keet (talk·contribs· new pages (5)) started on 2016-08-04, score: 20
Hello, Dentren. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Causes of the War of the Pacific". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 11 December 2016.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 15:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Request for mediation rejected
The request for formal mediation concerning Causes of the War of the Pacific, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Causes of the War of the Pacific (2.)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 19 December 2016.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 12:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Chilean expansionism
Hi Dentren! I hope you're enjoying your holiday season. Thank you for the edits on the article Chilean expansionism. Do keep an eye on it and let me know if there is any material there that might need further improvement or referencing (I'm still reading a few more books on the subject). Best regards.--MarshalN20✉🕊 23:49, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Valdivian history until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 19:53, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination for deletion of Template:People of the German colonization of southern Chile
Hello, Dentren. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Also, your signature has an unescaped pipe character (|), which must be coded as | to avoid messing up templates.
I see from this edit that these matters have not yet been addressed. The exposed pipe character is causing problems, for example with the RfC listing pages - where this addition is only partially displayed. I have partially fixed your posts in that thread, with the effect that the RfC is now listed properly - but I would be grateful if you would fix your signature so that such problems do not occur gong forward. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:08, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pelotillehue until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 12:20, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Sánchez de la Hoz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kirbanzo (talk) 14:07, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tricontinental Chile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. funplussmart (talk) 00:23, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Dentren. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Dentren. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Category:Roman Catholic trade unionists has been nominated for discussion
Category:Roman Catholic trade unionists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 00:57, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect LLifén. Since you had some involvement with the LLifén redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:33, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination for deletion of Template:Seismic faults of South America
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francisco de Carvajal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sack of Rome (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:45, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for June 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of agriculture in Chile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campesino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Punta Gruesa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chilean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
Hi. I see in a recent addition to Human sacrifice you included material copied from 1960 Valdivia earthquake. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying within Wikipedia in the future. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa🍁 (talk) 14:09, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Request for help
Hello Dentren. I wanted to ask for help with an article I made recently (Manuel Hipólito Orella), to improve grammar and structure since my English is not very refined. I realized that you are interested in the story, and since the article is about a historical character, it occurred to me to make this request. Hope you access the request, the article is not long. Please. --Muwatallis II (talk) 21:07, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, it will be my priority to finish them and publish them. --Muwatallis II (talk) 00:00, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
August 2019
You are edit warring to keep reliably sourced information hidden in a footnote. This is inappropriate. Please self-revert. Simonm223 (talk) 14:45, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:21, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for August 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mapuche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tehuelche (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:08, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
UnitedStatesian , go ahead en delete. It was a mistake. Dentren | Talk 10:40, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, it will be gone in 7 days. Unless you want to put the {{db-g7}} tag on it. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:15, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
September 2019
Your recent editing history at Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Acroterion(talk) 14:05, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is the second time you've been warned for edit-warring on this subject. Acroterion(talk) 14:06, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Muy mal hecho por parte de zUsuario:Superzerocool en tratar de suprimir información judicial sobre Boric. Las condenas judiciales son públicas. Estos son hechos que resurgen de ves en cuando en cuanto a la crítica del carácter moral de Boric. Lo sensato es tener una discusión sobre si incluir la información o no.
DYK for Battle of Río Bueno
On 3 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Río Bueno, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Mapuche-Huilliche of southern Chile defeated a slave-hunting Spanish army at the Battle of Río Bueno in 1654? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Río Bueno. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Battle of Río Bueno), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
WP:BRD is not working because users who oppose my edits are not caring about reading what is actually said and are missproying me as a promoter of constiracy theories. Being "around for many years" means that I also know when one's well-intended edits are dismissed on poor grounds. I mean users who does even take their time to read what one's comments. Dentren | Talk 10:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk! 19:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk! 12:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk! 12:52, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk! 12:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk! 13:02, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:South American racehorses
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk! 00:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for May 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Huilo-Huilo Biological Reserve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campesino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Military dictatorship of Chile (1973–1990), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peña (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
Category:Echinoderms of Chile has been nominated for merging
Category:Echinoderms of Chile has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor(talk) 05:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 12:25, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again. Since a prep builder placed your image in the lead slot, I created a stub article for María José Quintanilla. Feel free to expand it, and even nominate it for DYK. Best, Yoninah (talk) 13:20, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jesuit missionaries in Mexico
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk! 14:37, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Professor Matti Seppälä
Professor Matti Seppälä has passed away. I tried to update this into the article. There may still be details to fix.--Urjanhai (talk) 09:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk! 16:09, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Place Clichy (talk) 13:07, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Place Clichy (talk) 13:07, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Governors of the Magallanes Territory
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk! 16:17, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for March 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited White Earthquake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moribund.
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Mate (drink), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:38, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My disruptive behaviour?
Have you been paying attention to the article or are you seeing t he red alert and reacting? An anon has sourced the content and so you should be aware that you are now fighting against sources and WP:CONSENSUS. That is the definition of disruptive behaviour. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:35, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That key content need to be clearly sourced with reliable sources is not up for "consensus". So far you have failed to provide a rationale on why the origins of mate mentioned in the infobox should not be clearly sourced with WP:RS. If you insist with disruptive behaviour that is contrary to Wikipedia policy, and in fact fact reminiscent of WP:OWN, I will report you. Dentren | Talk 01:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'd love to see you make that point in an ANI (or similar) discussion. You'd be laughed at. and speaking of OWN... don't be so quick to claim that of others when you're clearly showing that behaviour yourself. I am a caretaker and when editors like you come along I correct them. I'm fin to continue this discussion in the correct venue though. Feel free to report me and be prepared for a very large WP:BOOMERANG. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk! 13:35, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Category:17th-century Belgian Roman Catholic priests has been nominated for merging
Category:17th-century Belgian Roman Catholic priests has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 21:42, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:18th-century Belgian clergy
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk! 15:52, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:17th-century Belgian clergy
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk! 14:25, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for June 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crimen (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glamour.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prisoners of the Revolt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aftershock (2012 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ariel Levy.
Thanks for uploading File:Rebelde Neltume.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination for deletion of Template:Timeline of the history of Chile
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Argentina–Chile border, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manso River.
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Tuvixer (talk) 09:27, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Tuvixer (talk) 20:33, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Tuvixer (talk) 09:33, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Inflation in Chile
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Tuvixer (talk) 09:34, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Medical College
[1] Have fun. --Bedivere (talk) 18:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Explosions in South America by country
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk! 03:14, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for June 6
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
Hello, I'm Bedivere. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Izkia Siches seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This is like the third time we encounter while you're trying to make non neutral changes. I will have to report you at ANI if you continue to so so.Bedivere (talk) 16:13, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:30, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unblock
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I appear to have been blocked for reverting User:Bedivere's edits apparently violating WP:3RR, but WP:3RR states that there is an exemption when "Reverting actions performed by banned users in violation of a ban, and sockpuppets or meatpuppets of banned or blocked users." User:Bedivere is banned user Diego Grez-Cañete. Dentren | Talk 02:49, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
Procedural decline. This old unblock request is for a different block. Yamla (talk) 20:35, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Repeated disruptive editing warning
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at El Líbero. You've already been blocked once for the exact same reason. Are you trying to get blocked permanently? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 03:36, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What a misleading statement. Take a look inte the history of the article to see who is who. Dentren | Talk 15:30, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
August 2022
Your recent editing history at El Líbero shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bedivere (talk) 19:14, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 20:50, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you edit-war again after expiration of this block, the next block will be indefinite.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:50, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dentren, please don't issue edit warringdisruptive editing warnings weeks after the fact. These should be issued within days at max. Weeks is too stale. Thanks. El_C 13:27, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
El_C, yes it is indeed late. I was going to issue the warning earlier but could not do so. Dentren | Talk 22:22, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Gabriel Boric
The article being incomplete, does not mean it is non neutral. If you want to add content, you can just go ahead and add it. Obviously, it needs to comply with Wikipedia policies such as WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE. Bedivere (talk) 15:47, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk! 01:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Amarillos por Chile, you may be blocked from editing. Bedivere (talk) 19:00, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 01:04, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Death flights
"(Undid revision 1104627365 by Citizen127 (talk)-not evidently unencyclopedic, discuss in talk first)" I did, you ignored it: "The section titled "Extraordinary rendition" is clearly a political editorial designed to discredit the US. The source is a political editorial written by one man not "scholars." This exaggeration appears to be intended to make the source seem more credible. The use of the term "US-led" here is political spin. There is no logical reason why a Wikipedia article about death flights should have a section on extraordinary rendition. Someone with a grudge against the US is trying to conflate the two for political reasons. Citizen127" Why would anyone deliberately ignore all that in this forum? Ignoring verifiable evidence, what does that mean? Citizen127 (talk) 13:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Mapuche territorial units has been nominated for merging
Category:Mapuche territorial units has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked
I have blocked you indefinitely because it is clear that you are refusing to get the point and change your conduct, despite a unanimous consensus in the ANI thread that you started that it is problematic. You have returned from a three-month block to continue the same dispute so it is clear that a temporary block would not be sufficient. You can appeal this block by posting {{unblock|your reason here}} and it will be reviewed by another uninvolved admin. I would suggest you read the guide to appealing blocks first, then compare your conduct to our behavioural policies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:10, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I find it utterly detrimental that block in "political" NPOV disputes repeatedly goes only the way. It is therefore I have sought to discuss and evaluate of if user:Daniel Case have acted correctly. Administrators should be able to be held accountable. It think User:HJ Mitchell has acted wrongly by permanently banning me and attempting to suppress the discussion. HJ Mitchell accuses me of "refusing to get the point", yet I have not been involved in any edit war since being unblocked. I do have gotten the point. It seems to me rather that User:HJ Mitchell found me annoying and argumentative since I rebuffed his narrative about bias in the Vallejo article [2]. That I have just sought to accuse the apparent bias in warnings and bans. Again, suppressing discussion is not the way. The Danial_Case case was first time I sought to challenge a block. Dentren | Talk 16:47, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
Considering you are not only continuing to argue you are right, but you are now attacking multiple admins, I am declining. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:43, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Come on, Dentren. The first you did after being unblocked was reinstating a "neutrality" tag on the Gabriel Boric article just because (as it reads from your talk page post) it is kind of outdated or it does not reflect some recent political controversies. Not only the tag is unwarranted, it is obvious you only intend to force your point of view onto articles and onto others. HJ has acted correctly. --Bedivere (talk) 17:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Concern regarding Draft:Assassination of Jaime Guzmán
Hello, Dentren. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Assassination of Jaime Guzmán, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People of the Chincha Islands War by nationality has been nominated for merging
Category:People of the Chincha Islands War by nationality has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 15:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Spanish literature academics has been nominated for renaming
Category:Spanish literature academics has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Chilean journalists by type has been nominated for merging
Category:Chilean journalists by type has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Category:17th-century Chilean historians has been nominated for splitting
Category:17th-century Chilean historians has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:58, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Slavery in Chile has been nominated for splitting
Category:Slavery in Chile has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 17:18, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Mapuche farmers has been nominated for deletion
Category:Mapuche farmers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People of Inca royalty descent has been nominated for merging
Category:People of Inca royalty descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Extinct volcanoes of the Andes has been nominated for merging with Template:Andean volcanoes. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:17, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
wijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikael
wikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.
Template:People of the German colonization of southern Chile has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Hello! Your submission of Mexican music in Chile at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:08, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Izkia Siches, you may be blocked from editing. Bedivere (talk) 16:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Dentren reported by User:Bedivere (Result: ). Thank you. Bedivere (talk) 20:49, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 June 18 § Category:Association football people by prefecture in Japan. Qwerfjkltalk 16:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)