Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Lualua Jr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Lualua Jr

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a non-notable filmmaker. Fails WP:NCREATIVE and WP:SIGCOV. The only reliable source is this, while the rest are blogs and gossip sites. Jamiebuba (talk) 22:05, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and Africa. Jamiebuba (talk) 22:05, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Doesn't meet WP:DIRECTOR or WP:GNG. I feel like the author of the article has close connection with the subject anyways → I can't find the image they uploaded anywhere public upon WP:BEFORE 1 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 04:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Sources are mostly unreliable WP:MILL. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination, article seems to have used every single mention of him online as sources, and I couldn't find anything more in depth than what's there in RS. Wikishovel (talk) 08:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no notability, nothing good in the refbomb.Tehonk (talk) 08:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per above. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 13:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom etc --Devoke water 01:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Contributor892z (talk) 06:25, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article is based far too heavily on unreliable sources that are not support for notability, and says nothing about him that would be "inherently" notable in the absence of a properly sourced pass of WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 17:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.