Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parmatma Ek Sevak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 02:34, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Parmatma Ek Sevak

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not noteworthy organization. No WP:RS coverage found. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion, Hinduism, India, and Maharashtra. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - 1. The sect has significant following in eastern part of Vidarbha.

2. Chief Minister of Maharashtra praised their work. https://x.com/cmomaharashtra/status/815528360415621121?s=46&t=WEvzL9ICcN6GgmjJ3HjA4g

3. Govt of India, Department of Post, released a post ticket featuring founder of the sect, released by vice-president of India. https://www.jagranjosh.com/current-affairs/amp/vice-president-of-india-released-a-commemorative-postage-stamp-of-baba-jumdev-1380607652-1

4. The article does need a cleanup, but it certainly meets notability criteria. Not many sources available in English as the sect works in marginalized sections and is not well-documented in academia. GD (talk) 18:08, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:17, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:40, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:57, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Being thanked by someone on Twitter isn't notable. This article has one source and the rest appears to be copied verbatim from the scriptures/holy texts this religion uses. I can't find mention of them. Oaktree b (talk) 15:18, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based the lack of sources I can find in English. If there are sources shown in other languages I’m happy to reconsider. Mccapra (talk) 20:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. DrowssapSMM (talk) (contributions) 02:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No WP:SIGCOV. Interestingly someone in the early page history pasted a huge dump of unsourced text that is probably a copyvio (though the detector doesn't come up with any significant hits) that still lives on the page today. It should have been reverted but never was. Uhai (talk) 12:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.