Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owle Schreame Awards (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:34, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Owle Schreame Awards

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One-off awards in 2014 to promote a small non-notable theatre company. No information since 2014. Official awards site has been dead since early 2016. This wiki article was created by a massively disruptive self-promotional sock/meat farm, and included numerous fake references (see [1]), which were accorded merit in the previous AfD. Softlavender (talk) 04:38, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Two of the four !voters in the previous AfD were members of the malicious sock/meat farm that have been creating wiki articles on persons relating to this non-notable theatre company. I and the other uninvolved !voter were fooled in that AfD by the fake references and the implication that this was going to be an annual awards ceremony. Softlavender (talk) 07:57, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:43, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:43, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:43, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:43, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete At least one of the references is broken, the remainder are essentially PR pieces in industry press. Without properly independent coverage this just isn't notable. Hugsyrup (talk) 08:48, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.