Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omajinai Perori

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Perfume discography#As lead artist. (non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 13:18, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Omajinai Perori

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication this passes WP:NALBUM, much less WP:GNG. No references. UtherSRG (talk) 11:53, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Japan. UtherSRG (talk) 11:53, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Perfume discography#As lead artist as {{R from song}} per WP:ATD. This is a plausible search term. ✗plicit 14:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 00:14, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NALBUM. LibStar (talk) 05:02, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think redirection to the artist's article is always preferable to deletion. This happens with most PROD'd album articles, as you know. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:58, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as I expressed an opinion here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the artist seems ok, I can't find much for this album. Oaktree b (talk) 19:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no sources cited to support the claims in the article and a quick search returned with only music download websites. Noneate (talk) 09:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Xplicit, a more acceptable fate in itself. (Never charted on Oricon, so that option's the only one left.) --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 16:38, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see how it can notable, or sufficient reason for a redirect. It is so obscure. Its been on the cat:nn for 13+ years with a tag and its never been adressed. Too obscure to be worth redirecting. scope_creep^Talk 06:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Obscure how? ✗plicit 00:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Third relist for further input…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Perfume discography#As lead artist as suggested above. Redirects are cheap and this article gets ~150 views a month; no reason to penalize readers here. Dekimasuよ! 07:20, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Xplicit. Seems to be a cromulent redirect. -- Visviva (talk) 01:09, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Perfume discography#As lead artist. No valid argument against redirection. Cavarrone 17:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the target suggested immediately above. The article itself would be fine if any sources are found so preserving the history for un-BLARing is the best option. Skynxnex (talk) 21:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.