Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nour Al Hassan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:54, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nour Al Hassan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Refs are PR and profiles. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 10:18, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Language, Technology, and Jordan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:30, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom, and my search for sources; this seems to be WP:PROMO without substantial independent and reliable sources to support notability at this time. For example, this CNN Money source is primarily based on what Al Hassan says; the article is also largely built around materials produced by Al Hassan and her company, a blog post, and various promotional sources. Beccaynr (talk) 21:59, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nour Al Hassan's biography is not a public relations page but a testament to her impactful contributions to women's empowerment in the Middle East. I have made changes to the page according to your feedback, and I would like to explain why I believe it should not be deleted.

I understand that the page can be further amended to meet Wikipedia's standards, and I will contnue to do this. Nour's advocacy for women's rights and her role as a role model for many in the region are key aspects that warrant inclusion on Wikipedia.

Advocacy for Women:

- Nour Al Hassan's commitment to advocating for women's rights in the Middle East is well-documented in various reliable sources.

- Her efforts extend beyond rhetoric, as she actively engages in initiatives aimed at improving the status and opportunities for women in the region.

Role Model for Women:

- Nour serves as an inspiration for countless women in the Middle East, with her story resonating as a tale of overcoming challenges and breaking barriers.

Job Creation for Mothers:

- An integral part of Nour Al Hassan's legacy is her commitment to creating job opportunities, particularly for mothers who face constraints in leaving their homes.

- This goes beyond mere business accomplishments, showcasing a socially responsible dimension that aligns with Wikipedia's emphasis on documenting positive societal contributions.

Incorporating these aspects into Nour Al Hassan's biography not only adheres to Wikipedia's standards but also enriches the platform by recognizing individuals who contribute significantly to societal progress.

Thank you very much. Wwat2023 (talk) 12:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:25, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Since it bas been relisted, it is worth examining the references. I'll look at the first two blocks.

Ref 1 [1] That is a image of Nour Al Hassan. Non-RS
Ref 2 [2] "She spoke to The Arab Weekly via WhatsApp." That is a WP:SPS source.
Ref 3 [3] This is a Forbes profile on a X of Y list. It is non-rs.
Ref 4 [4] This is a press-release. It states its a press-release. Non-rs.
Ref 5 [5] Another profile. Non-RS
Ref 6 [6] Another profile. Non-RS
Ref 7 [7] An event listing. Non-rs.
Ref 8 [8] An executive interview.
Ref 9 [9] Another profile. Same image as used above in the other profiles. Non-RS
Ref 10 [10] Another profile. Same image as used above in the other profiles. Non-RS
Ref 11 [11] A short interview.

So there you have it. Three interviews and another 8 non-rs references. Two of the interviews are primary and one is a whatsapp chat is non-rs. This is all PR. scope_creep^Talk 12:15, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I think if we had one more decent source this would be at notability. I agree with the assessment given above, not quit notable, yet. Oaktree b (talk) 14:48, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.