Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norah Alawadhi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:33, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Norah Alawadhi

Norah Alawadhi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She was in a picture, and did a few interviews about the picture. That is pretty much it. She hasn't had enough of a career as an activist or "influencer" to sustain an article. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:33, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:33, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:33, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:33, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom - support for WP:BASIC notability does not appear to exist. Beccaynr (talk) 04:44, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - essentially a WP:BLP1E. There's no coverage outside the "event" (which probably isn't notable either), and there's no reasonable redirect target. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:09, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I agree that Alawadhi is probably not notable, but perhaps the image is? The article could be moved to UAE-Israel peace image? Furius (talk) 12:51, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:12, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete best. She has done nothing with her career to be called an “activist”. Namely, she just stood in a picture. The majority of the people who saw the picture know the picture but not the person in it and rightfully so. Also as a “social media influencer”, she has neither the platform nor the content to be considered one. The entire character is just false and the article is self written.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.