Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ninja presence in Russia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 01:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ninja presence in Russia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability: Article cites no English-language RS and appears to be a jumble of information attempting to demonstrate the validity of the topic. Also lacks a reasonably encyclopedic viewpoint as to what is relevant to the topic. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 00:04, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Japan, and Russia. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 00:04, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. References do not have to be in English to be valid. There is a corresponding article in the Japanese Wikipedia at ja:忍者とロシアの関係 Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:14, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If someone in Burkina Faso is interested in ninjas and does some research on them, and maybe writes a play about them, that isn’t the basis for an article about a “Ninja presence in Burkina Faso.” Mccapra (talk) 03:22, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Mccapra. Just a jumble of information with tenuous links pretending to be an article. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 07:45, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete strange synthesis of OR and random quotes. The Portuguese or the Dutch traders were likely the first Europeans in the area anyway. Oaktree b (talk) 17:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article topic is unclear, and I don't see why "Ninja research in Russia" would be a notable topic anyway. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:37, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. The person who loves reading (talk) 17:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.