Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanae Katō (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Sk8erPrince (talk) 01:42, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nanae Katō

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous AFD closed as no consensus with WP:NPASR. Hence I'm renominating this article for deletion. Repeating previous arguments of the subject only having voiced as leads in Princess Tutu (Ahiru), the titular character of Croket (non-notable), and the completely non-notable titular character of Noramimi as reasons for the subject being non-notable. Let's try to reach a consensus this time. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 16:30, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - My argument stands from last time around, in addition this passes WP:NACTOR. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:33, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Passes WP:NACTOR with significant roles in multiple notable works. WP:NACTOR requires that the person has played major roles in works that are notable, not that the individual characters are notable enough for articles. Calathan (talk) 18:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - She is notable enough that she went to an anime convention in the US to promote Princess Tutu. [1] Croket is notable as it has a page here; it has 78 episodes and spawned a series of video games. As the title character this would probably fit in her infobox. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per all of the above, and also for procedural reasons.SephyTheThird (talk) 20:10, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural reasons my foot, Sephy. Read what WP:NPASR is before you go spouting your ignorance. Looks like nobody wants this article deleted. I'm withdrawing. I just wanted a proper consensus, that's all. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 01:42, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.