Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NFTStudio24

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deleted: another paid production by User:Annabananaxii Drmies (talk) 21:32, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NFTStudio24

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

NFTStudio24 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet notability criteria.

Mostly sourced to press releases, blog posts, and articles which were written by the company owner, no useful content would be left after removing that content.

I'm fairly sure it's at least in part being edited by people associated with the company, for example the recent edit by an anonymous IP who added links to tweets "recommending" the platform, someone who refers to themselves as a "team member" who reverted those tweets being removed as spam by a bot, and the initial versions which read even more like an advert. The same new editors are also trying to add links to it from other articles such as Digital Art which are then reverted. JaggedHamster (talk) 09:15, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for reply.
According to Wiki rules for new accounts, I am trying add useful link exciting articles.
For NFTStudio24, I am the team member of the team and try improve content and information and add source full links.
Your guideline is very important for us and I will always try to corporate with you.
Thank you Kyle154 (talk) 09:20, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately as you are associated with NFTStudio24 you shouldn't edit the article related to them, please read WP:COI — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaggedHamster (talk • contribs) 09:27, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
but we don't want to buy the service. thats why edited by own self Kyle154 (talk) 15:48, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Below text was added by User:Kyle154 at the same time as I was creating this page:

We are trying to solve this issue and more source full links in this article kindly give acceptance to edit it.

*Comment They have permission to edit it, we're seeing if it's worthy of inclusion here. Oaktree b (talk) 14:28, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reply, we would like to add the authorized twitters, is it allow ? Kyle154 (talk) 15:46, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
twitter is not a reliable source. Oaktree b (talk) 19:04, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Only sources are the typical mix of paid placement interviews and press releases that always accompany such promotional articles. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. - MrOllie (talk) 16:38, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok , I got your point. Thanks alot for your prompt response. Kyle154 (talk) 16:58, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment:. I'm here connected to none for creation of this Article here and thank you MrOllie to letting me know about the Paid editing in Wikipedia. I don't know who's this Kyle154 who is claiming to be the Team member. You should block this 8 hours old Account and the IP which is continiously harming the Article. Thank You TheWandererBihari (talk) 17:09, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not notable enough, not enough sources covering this site.Fulmard (talk) 18:27, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Fulmard , Thank you so much for guide us. I understand your point that the notable coving site is not enough and I am working on more source and its take time and as you say that no enough source but they are source.
    please corporate with me, I am trying to improve my writing and collect data. Kyle154 (talk) 23:05, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Dear Sir, can we add the staff details along with the notable awards? Kyle154 (talk) 05:21, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    This isn't linkedIn, and we're looking for articles about the company in quality sources like the New York Times or other prominent media. A staff list isn't really appropriate in Wikipedia, regardless of the status of the deletion discussion. Oaktree b (talk) 19:05, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/NFTStudio24&oldid=1098594732"