Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minnesota Institute for Talented Youth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:36, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Minnesota Institute for Talented Youth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability. Jprg1966 ^(talk) 15:11, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (warn) @ 16:31, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:30, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I added some references. I would treat this as a secondary school and consider it automatically notable on that basis. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:43, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Eastmain: ... but it's not a secondary school. It's an enrichment program - just a private business. Except for the book you added, the sources are primary and appear to be advertizements. I can't actually see what's in the book but it looks like the subject was mentioned on only one page: [1]. --Sammy1339 (talk) 23:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:33, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.