Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milwaukee brewery shooting (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Milwaukee brewery shooting

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable crime, no sustained coverage beyond the sequence of events. Wikipedia is not a repository of news stories. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Events, and Wisconsin. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination. With all due respect to the victims, alas, this tragedy lacks notability. TH1980 (talk) 01:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:SUSTAINED. Esolo5002 (talk) 04:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - significant coverage. Good sourcing. Earlier AfD established notability for this event. An event like this does not become non-notable just because its not in the press every day years later. The sourcing shows notability, and 6 deaths are a high number. Per WP:GNG as well.BabbaQ (talk) 08:30, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there is obviously sigcov from the days after the attack. There is also lasting coverage imo (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Also there are retrospectives about how racism may have influenced the shooter, 1 Lettlre (talk) 17:27, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article is also pretty bad, I will improve it if it is kept. Lettlre (talk) 17:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Satisfies WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: based on amount of coverage, meets WP:GNG.Royal88888 (talk) 08:33, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Covered by at least several dozen RS, even if limited lasting impact. On search I also found this https://www.fox6now.com/news/miller-brewery-shooting-2-years-later which gets closer to satisfying WP:SUSTAINED BrigadierG (talk) 00:28, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Article is in bad state, but the coverage goes beyond routine-style reporting and was somewhat sustained. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:27, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.