Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Hackett (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is no inherent objection to a redirect, but the consenus is to delete. Drmies (talk) 23:14, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Hackett

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Architect from Northern Ireland, but all of the awards and achievements are attributable to the company Hackett Hall McKnight, of which he is one partner. True, Hackett Hall McKnight might be a notable company, but there is no coverage about Hackett individually. He has a slight profile because he writes for various publications. Fails WP:GNG, WP:CREATIVE and WP:PROF. Sionk (talk) 13:04, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Clear from the article he's not inherently notable. His work might render notability, but all the sources are web ephemera. Agricola44 (talk) 16:13, 27 October 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Comment I've created a Hackett Hall McKnight article if anyone wants to suggest a plausible redirect (though Hackett is no longer a partner). Sionk (talk) 18:17, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: WP is not WP:LINKEDIN.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 19:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This seems to be a clear example of WP:RESUME. Fails WP:GNG. --Jersey92 (talk) 23:12, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.