Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manluluyong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:RHaworth under criterion G3. (Non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 16:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Manluluyong

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No good sources of any kind that I looked up online mentions the Manluluyong, so it probably fails on notability; I'm not declaring it a hoax this time. TheGGoose (talk) 15:05, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now. I can't find any good English-language sources online. Bearian (talk) 17:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:49, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as hoax - does not exist outside Wikipedia; according to my research "luyong" means "background" and not "hover" —Мандичка^YO 😜 04:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.