Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madison Collins "Keurig Girl"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 22:24, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Madison Collins "Keurig Girl"

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This week's internet viral story du jour. I believe we should wait to see if this story has any effect past the single week's news before allowing an article to exist. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 05:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that Collins has already received enough attention and media for a page. Over five articles have been written about Collins. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohshaleyeah (talk • contribs) 05:25, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I did not know what a "du jour" is before this. It means "of the day". Mostly blogs/local press/minor student press coverage [1][2][3], and no lasting effect when coverage stopped before February. I am discouraged to keep at the start already, when Google News search of "Keurig Girl" without quotes does not show her until the 5th result. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 08:15, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless someone can figure out how to merge some of this content into a not-yet-written section of the Keurig article that discusses the public image of the brand. Taken on its own merits, I tend to think Madison Collins is covered by WP:BIO1E and maybe WP:BLP1E. --Arxiloxos (talk) 20:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.