Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Real TV (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

London Real TV

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Weekly online video broadcast that was raised at AfD several years ago but had no discussion for some bizarre reason. The only thing that would stop it being speedied is an unsubstantiated claim that it has "established a reputation". Apart from that, it's cited to social media and its own website. I can't see any evidence at all online that it has been widely noticed or developed a 'reputation'. It truly fails WP:GNG and needs to go. Sionk (talk) 22:35, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:38, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The first eposode has 3,049 views since 2011 and others I checked are no beter. They don't have 250,000 subscribers, more like 150,000. Given their first episode has so few views it would be shocking if they added up to 40 million views. With the key claims overblown, I don't trust the rest of the article. Legacypac (talk) 08:26, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Blythwood (talk) 08:36, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.