Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lokenath Brahmachari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 03:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lokenath Brahmachari

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. BangJan1999 23:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion, Hinduism, India, and West Bengal. BangJan1999 23:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of reliable sources that can be verified. Psychologist Guy (talk) 01:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep venerated saint in Bengal. [1] Bangla Hindustan Times, [2] Bangla Aajtak, [3],[4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. is quite developed.Redtigerxyz ^Talk 10:15, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The content added to the article is unreliable [10]. I have already discussed this at length at WP:FTN. Shri Shital Chandra Pal is not an academic publisher. These are 20-30 page self-published booklets with cartoon cover-arts [11]. The booklet has not been translated into English. No academic or historian would cite this source. It is not useful for Wikipedia. It's claims cannot be verified. Psychologist Guy (talk) 17:29, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Draft: The above sources show that an article might be possible, but as the article stands it is not ready for mainspace. The entire article is the subject's name + "was a Bengali yogi." - four words. // Timothy :: talk 12:58, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:27, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Redtigerxyz's "sources" include a website called Learnreligions.com, a self-published book by some Sanjiv Shukla, a trivial mention in a Brill Handbook (the lone source in our article), a Bengali man mentioning the name in response to an anthropologist, a trivial mention in a journalist's profile of the state elections, etc. The Hindustan Times article is classed under the "astrology" section; ofcourse, a reliable source - how can it not be? Perhaps they ought to read WP:SIGCOV; this discussion is not about proving that Loknath brahmachari is not a hoax. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:06, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I couldn't find sources to pass WP:GNG. Suonii180 (talk) 16:30, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.