Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional towns and villages (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 09:48, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of fictional towns and villages

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mostly WP:OR and unreferenced fictional cruft. There are a number of other satellite pages that are equally as crufty.

Their names are incorrect as well, as most of them also list cities. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 02:48, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It could be better organized. --Foia req (talk) 04:57, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:12, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:12, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:13, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:13, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep List of fictional towns in literature especially, because the places depicted in literature are relevant, and most those listed have articles. It is only WP:OR as you say because it is not yet referenced. Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 08:05, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Usually I'm more of a deletionist kind of editor. I don't like seeing long, unsourced "list of..." articles. For this one however, I don't feel that way. There are plenty of fictional places that have been written extensively about, and there are already several sources there. I am in favor of trimming any OR/synth material in this article though. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 10:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and improve. bd2412 T 12:58, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with the recommendation to remove any entries that aren't blue-linked. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:26, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. List-items do not need to be individually notable so having no link is okay, or having a redlink is okay, as long as the item is supported by reliable sourcing. As for the List of fictional counties (also at AFD), having a list-article actually helps to head off creation of separate articles about marginal topics. This list-article seems like an excellent reference, a good use of Wikipedia. --Doncram (talk) 17:33, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Doncram. List items shouldn't need their own article provided they are reliably sourced. -- Whats new?^(talk) 23:51, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all valid topics for lists, the subjects are notable Atlantic306 (talk) 22:05, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Fictional places obviously satisfy LISTN. There is little or no original research: an extant work of fiction is a reliable source for its own contents. James500 (talk) 02:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC) I think an early close under WP:SNOW is in order, there being eight "keeps" and no opposition. James500 (talk) 23:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.