Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Ely (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 20:44, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of bus routes in Ely

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm the major contributor and page creator and tried to delete it using CSD G7 which was declined. This page is not notable see WP:NOTGUIDE & WP:PRIMARY. At the very least merger with List of bus routes in Cambridgeshire should take place. Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 17:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I declined that speedy because WP:CSD#G7 states "provided that the only substantial content to the page and to the associated talk page was added by its author". There are several major contributors to the article, such as this one by Rcsprinter123. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:42, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Only 1 edit has been made by him.Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 18:08, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't matter how many edits there were: what matters is how much was added or changed by editors other than the page creator. You are not the author of the only substantial content, therefore you can't put a {{db-author}} on the page. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:16, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DeleteWhat makes these bus routes notable?JoelWhy (talk) 21:16, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable enough. At worst, consider a merge. Rcsprinter (constabulary) 20:48, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete How is it notable? It has no sources!--Charles (talk) 21:07, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable, only possible sources are primary schedules.and maps that aren't useful when writing an encyclopedic article. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 19:17, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing WP:N. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:59, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.