Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nobel laureates affiliated with the City University of New York

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Bad idea Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 22:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Nobel laureates affiliated with the City University of New York

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On the recent RfC of what a list should be and more pertinently what is a good and what is a bad list, there was much focus on the topic of a list. The topic of this list is "Laureates affiliated with the City University of New York" and I doubt it would survive as a proper article. So to test the waters/agreement of what should and shouldn't be a list, I nominate this for deletion. Sandman888 (talk) 15:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep and a Troutslap for Sandman888. Carrite (talk) 16:29, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Meets all requirements for Wikipedia. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 19:31, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. The nomination indicates the purpose of this AfD is to "test the waters" and fails to discuss why the subject might be inappropriate as a list. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:21, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.