Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Florida State Seminoles men's golfers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:50, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Florida State Seminoles men's golfers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced and fails WP:LISTN notability. Could possibly be merged to Florida State Seminoles men's golf or simply left as Category:Florida State Seminoles men's golfers - Mr X 22:13, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:34, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:34, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:LISTPURP as an index of articles, and as a complement to Category:Florida State Seminoles men's golfers. "Unsourced" is irrelevant, unless the nom is claiming that membership in this list is somehow false or unverifiable, in which case they wouldn't be fine with merging or with leaving the category intact, as that is the exact same classification just in a different format. Obviously notable as a group or Florida State Seminoles men's golf shouldn't exist, even if we assumed satisfying LISTN was required here (it isn't). Also, if merger is acceptable (and I have no objection to merging to Florida State Seminoles men's golf, size-wise it could fit there), then deletion is off the table (and should have been attempted first) per WP:ATD. postdlf (talk) 01:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:CLT, merge would work too since the two articles are quite short. ansh 666 01:59, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NOTDUP relative to Category:Florida State Seminoles men's golfers. No prejudice against merging to Florida State Seminoles men's golf. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:31, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.