Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liang-Jie Zhang (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 03:11, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Liang-Jie Zhang

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is an OR autobiography and an orphan, and has been for over two years with no sign of improvement. » Swpb^{τ • ¢} 21:54, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. He passes WP:PROF #C2 (the IEEE Technical Achievement Award), #C3 (IEEE Fellow), and #C8 (editor in chief of two journals), so notability is a lot clearer now than it was in the previous AfD when only #C8 was in play. Being an autobiography is not a good thing, but in this case it would be better dealt with by cleaning up the article (I've made a start but it needs a lot more) and possibly sanctioning the user who has been doing it (very likely unnecessary since the article was quite far out of date).—David Eppstein (talk) 06:37, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Seems to have a GS h index of 16 so may just make WP:Prof#C1. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:27, 2 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.