Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liam McLaughlin (baseball)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:52, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Liam McLaughlin (baseball)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A low-level college baseball player lacking significant independent sources. The prod was removed by the creator. User:Namiba 22:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Baseball and Connecticut. User:Namiba 22:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The lack of independent sources that discuss him in significant depth renders the subject non-notable at this time. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, even by the nonsensical standards nowadays where minor leaguers are more notable than major leaguers, this one is nowhere near GNG. Wizardman 23:01, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not meeting athletic notability, I don't see notability for the esports colour commentator position either. What's given is simply confirmation of a college athlete. Oaktree b (talk) 00:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Rlendog (talk) 14:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Subject lacks the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. The sources are either routine namedrops or are primary. Let'srun (talk) 18:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks in Depth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.