Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Benton (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:15, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren Benton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Time for another AfD considering Wikipedia has changed since September 2012 and frankly my searches found nothing better at all, the current article certainly also is not satisfying the applicable notability so there's simply nothing else convincing. The best links I found at all were only these. SwisterTwister talk 06:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:36, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: Looks like most of her activity has moved over to Facebook and social media, but notability does not diminish over time and she does meet WP:BASIC, then and now. Organization still exists and is active. [1] Got a shoutout from Russell Brand here Also, this AfD needs to be posted to more of the AfD group listings. Montanabw ^(talk) 18:25, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 16:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The sources are not of the level to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets WP:BASIC. Hmlarson (talk) 01:39, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.