Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johanna Graham (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 21:15, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Johanna Graham

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that she meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Last AfD had a delete, an on the fence and a keep. Hopefull, with greater participation, we can resolve this. Pinging those involved in looking at its notability previously: Tomwsulcer, Раціональне анархіст, Diagear. Boleyn (talk) 06:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 06:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 14:13, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 14:13, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 14:13, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 05:17, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:17, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment to closer Can I ask that this is relisted once or twice more, as otherwise it will be swiftly sent back to AfD, and that would be a waste of time. I'd really like to get a consensus this time - either way. Boleyn (talk) 06:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Nakon 01:14, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:14, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete: Some coverage, but not enough to be significant under WP:BASIC:
- [1] - one sentence on the subject
- [2] - two sentences on the subject.
- and many passing mentions, most of them focusing on the "Johanna Graham Quartet" instead of the subject.

- Esquivalience ^t 02:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom fails WP:GNG do not think there is significant coverage and are the references only passing mentions and further do no think the awards are notable. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:15, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.