Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeakson Singh Thounaojam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jeakson Singh Thounaojam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. PROD rejected as he apparently does pass GNG but I don't think he does. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 15:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:52, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:TOOSOON. fails subject specific guidelines, specifically WP:NFOOTBALL which specifically excludes youth football as inherently notable. Coverage is WP:ROUTINE and per WP:ANYBIO does not indicate he has made widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record of football. ClubOranje^T 21:13, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Govvy (talk) 21:16, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFOOTY failure. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amine Gouiri is on a similar subject if anyone wants to comment there too. Cheers, Number 57 08:52, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Number 57: Amiri is completely different case. Agree that Jeakson Singh should be deleted though.
Delete - doesn't pass WP:GNG nor WP:FOOTY.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - far, far WP:TOOSOON. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY, there is a good amount of coverage but it is all centered around the goal he scored in the u-17 world cup, and not about the subject himself so fails WP:BLP1E. Inter&anthro (talk) 23:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 12:30, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:17, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 20:01, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per all above points Spiderone 22:26, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:TOOSOON. Only claim to fame right now is the goal he has scored. Coderzombie (talk) 04:22, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.