Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayatirtha Dasa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:46, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jayatirtha Dasa

Jayatirtha Dasa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG, doesn't seem to have any significant independent coverage. MRRaja001 ^(talk) 06:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Religion. MRRaja001 ^(talk) 06:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Significant figure in modern Gaudiya Vaishnavism and the Hare Krishna movement/ISKCON in particular. Lots of coverage in independent third-party sources: eg [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] Dāsānudāsa (talk) 11:47, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:16, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I'm unable to open any of the GBooks sources given, or they are only snippets. From what I see, it appears trivial coverage. Oaktree b (talk) 14:23, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes WP:BASIC & WP:SIGCOV on my accounts. Did a search and seems to have significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Article may need some work but should be kept, not removed.RealPharmer3 (talk) 23:57, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.