Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese people who conserve Article 9 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1; the nomination is only proposing a merge. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese people who conserve Article 9

Japanese people who conserve Article 9 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Overlaps with The Nobel Peace Prize for Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution and should be merged with that Rathfelder (talk) 10:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep. 1. AfDs are not for mergers, they are for deletions. 2. The article you want to "delete" is the older and more general one, the merge target is the newer and less general one. Merging the other way around, if a merge is needed, is the way to go. Fram (talk) 10:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep as explained by Fram. The article title sounds weird but proves to be notable -- see Japan Daily Press, for example. Andrew D. (talk) 11:34, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Weird title but contains reliably sourced content.AfD is not for forced merger, nominator should start merge discussion at the appropriate talkpage. –Ammarpad (talk) 10:26, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.