Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Science, Trade & Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 08:12, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Institute of Science, Trade & Technology

Institute of Science, Trade & Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Setting aside this article's other issues, from its very first revision it has contained the line "Note: This university is completely fictional." Even if this is a real institution, there doesn't seem to be too much to salvage here. Nick Number (talk) 22:01, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete as a blatant hoax (WP:G3); the author explicitly admitted to creating a hoax article. It doesn’t seem to be discussing a university from a work of fiction. 165.91.13.168 (talk) 22:37, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not Sure- It has a website, but beyond that I can't really verify anything. The website looks legit, but I just don't know, I don't think speedy delete is appropriate because someone may come up with more information that would allow us determine if it exists or not.--Rusf10 (talk) 00:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:16, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:16, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a lack of sources to verrify its status.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep One should not attach any significance to the fact that the infobox in the first revision contained the words "Note: This university is completely fictional." That was copied directly from the "University of Illyria" example in Template:Infobox university, probably without understanding what it meant or why it was there. The article is not a hoax. The institute is an affiliated college of National University, albeit not an important or well-known one. As to the article's other issues, feel free to gut it of anything unsourced, unintelligible, or unencyclopedic - we at WikiProject Bangladesh do that all the time to articles about educational institutions in Bangladesh. --Worldbruce (talk) 20:33, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ahh, that does make sense. Its purpose was difficult to fathom. Nick Number (talk) 23:23, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Not a hoax, and we generally assume universities and colleges are notable and articles are kept on that precedence.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 05:25, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep- as long as we are sure it exists then we should keep.--Rusf10 (talk) 05:33, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:33, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a higher education institution per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:49, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Institute_of_Science,_Trade_%26_Technology&oldid=1069519415"