Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honey Ojukwu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:21, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Honey Ojukwu

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Honey Ojukwu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Honey Ojukwu is not notable. I suspect this article is a paid job because the page creator accepted the fact he has a Conflict of interest and paid editing works before appealing for an unblock. None of the awards has she won or being nominated are notable. Her references could also be from a conflict of interest with the way the headlines are written because she’s also a media person. It’s a suspect that her mission is to get verified on instagram and Twitter using wikipedia as a reference and that is why she stated her Wikipedia link on her instagram and Twitter profile here https://instagram.com/honeyojukwu and here https://twitter.com/theradiolioness . This is what few people do with their mentality but we get caught someday. Gabriel (talk to me ) 12:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, News media, Radio, and Nigeria. Gabriel (talk to me ) 12:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Albie xo and Techwritar who seems to be a sock haven’t edited wikipedia since 2020 after their contribution together on the article.--Gabriel (talk to me ) 13:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Student Friendship award isn't notable, not sure what the other one she won even means. Most mentions on the web appear PR stuff. COI also likely indicates this isn't notable. If you can't prove your notability using external sources, getting someone to do it for you isn't the best idea. There is coverage in Vanguard News ("not every pretty woman sleeps around", "not waiting for a man to take care of her needs" along those lines), which is very much tabloid stuff. Oaktree b (talk) 13:41, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Oaktree b. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 16:24, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. @Gabriel601: Where on the linked page has Techwritar "accepted the fact he has a Conflict of interest and paid editing works"? I have looked, and find them saying "I have never been paid to edit Wikipedia". More generally, please link to diffs, not whole talk pages, when making such claims. I'm also unclear what is meant by Her references could also be from a conflict of interest with the way the headlines are written because she’s also a media person.. Please clarify. Linking to Wikipedia from social media profiles is not a reason for deletion. Finally, I see no justification for the claim that the Nigeria Music Choice Awards are not notable. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:28, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  To those uncreated wiki pages you linked on her articles. If they were already in existence would have been a good reason for a keep that she has worked in Notable radio stations but still doesn’t still makes her notable because their a lot of OAP as well like her who ain’t known but working for Notable radio stations, that doesn’t makes them suitable to be on Wikipedia. Not all radio stations are notable and that could be the reason they haven’t been created. So linking an uncreated page on her article I don’t think that adds any useful contribution to be keep. The uncreated page Nigeria Music Choice Awards, I just checked on Google and I can’t find any good source proving that the award is notable or either suitable to be on Wikipedia. When talking about Nigerian Notable OAP’s and sources not related to them, Honey Ojukwu is no where to Do2tun, Toolz, Toke Makinwa and so on. I’m a Nigerian so I know more of this entertainment and hope my clarifications are now clear to you. --Gabriel (talk to me ) 12:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I see you from England. That’s nice and I hope to be in London some day lol. Kudos to your country artist ArrDee on his debut album Pier Pressure (mixtape) which I love listening --Gabriel (talk to me ) 13:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• You have not substantiated your claim about what Techwritar said
• You have not explained your "references could also be from a conflict of interest..." comment
• The addition of links—red or blue—to the article in question is irrelevant to its notability
• Google search results are not the arbiter of notability
• Your nationality and your original research give you no special authority in this debate

-- Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:28, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note also Ojukwu won the 2020 ELOY Award for "On Air Personality of the Year", which itself makes her notable. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:38, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I am a celebrity and see no reason my page should be deleted --Ojukwu754272 (talk) 13:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Honey Ojukwu is a big OAP in cool fm ph city. --OjukwuManager (talk) 14:03, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • User:OjukwuManager has referred on their talk page to Honey Ojukwu as "my client". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Who is turns out to be a sock of the filer of this AfD.... Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 15:17, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: and salt this is UPE from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ojukwu754272 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Timtrent: How do you reach that conclusion? If anything, this appears to be an attempt to use socks to ensure deletion of an artcile on a notable subject. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    @Pigsonthewing It's quite bizarre. It looks like a UPE sockfarm has fallen out with one of its members. That suggests to me that, if the person is notable then someone else should create the article. I despise UPE and see every reason for neither side to benefit 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:39, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 14:22, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I'm confused. The nominator (who thinks it should be deleted) has sock puppets who claim it should stay. Regardless, there are WAY too many issues going on here. The article needs to be speedily deleted. An uninterested user can rewrite from scratch if need be. It's me... Sallicio!^{${\displaystyle \color {Red}\oplus }$} 14:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The socks will do that sometimes, using one sock to make another sock look back, therefore making the first sock appear to be a real live person. "Why would a sock argue with another one?", quaint, but still happens. Oaktree b (talk) 17:52, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Prob delete - I can't find much that suggests notability and the page is no real help. So I'd say soft delete until/unless someone can recreate with better sources if/when they exist. JMWt (talk) 19:32, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I couldn't find evidence that WP:GNG is met. Please ping me if good sources are identified. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 12:40, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.