Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiroshima International University

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hiroshima International University

Hiroshima International University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, as it is a private school with no WP:SIGCOV. Did a BEFORE (both in English and in Japanese), and all I could find were those websites that list schools' addresses and stuff. Included websites do not satisfy SIGCOV either, I'm pretty sure.

AriTheHorse^{talk to me!}

02:11, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

• I don't agree personally to be deleted because the university is good enough and has 4025 FTE students in 2023 with 0.5% of international students according to Times Higher Education ^[1]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edogang1 (talk • contribs) 02:32, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Schools, Medicine, and Japan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It's a notable school it'll just be hard to find sources for it. Looking at Google Scholar the school does appear to be producing research. [1] Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 08:14, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note I've added some more sources. Dr vulpes (Talk) 21:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:55, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I agree with @Dr vulpes and @Edogang1 that this is a notable school. Quick search finds some quick hits that, while not enough to build an article on, leave me confident that a more robust search would result in plenty. [2] [3] [4] [5] This article needs work, not deletion. DCsansei (talk) 20:41, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I would just like to see further review of sources mentioned in the discussion and added to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, after reviewing the sources mentioned in this discussion and added to the article, it's clear that there's plenty of deep independent secondary coverage about this school. Left guide (talk) 05:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.