Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hessle Rangers F.C.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hessle Rangers F.C.

Hessle Rangers F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Amateur football club which has never played in the FA Cup or the top ten levels of the English football league system, the yardstick of notability used by WP:FOOTY. Doesn't pass WP:GNG either - no significant coverage in indepedent reliable sources, pretty much everything in the article has been added by editors with a clear conflict of interest. Tagged for notability for around three years. -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 07:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 07:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Per nom. League Octopus (League Octopus 08:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC))[reply]
• Delete. Per nom; fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTY consensus. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:17, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all of the above. Number 57 19:46, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - the article is not sourced and thus fails to meet WP:GNG. Also, they never played in a notable game or did anything notable. →TSU ^tp* 06:19, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 18:07, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.