Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayate Ichinose

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kishiryu Sentai Ryusoulger. T. Canens (talk) 02:25, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hayate Ichinose

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Coverage for this actor consists of two list entries and one management company blurb. Insufficient notability. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:23, 24 May 2019 (UTC) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:23, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:24, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:24, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:25, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:26, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Redirect going by available sources, there's more information about the character that the subject plays than about the subject. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:51, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete subject fails GNG. HM Wilburt (talk) 00:48, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning keep. I'm not convinced the above reactions are taking Japanese-language materials into account. At first glance coverage in Japanese does seem to indicate he could pass WP:GNG. I see 7330 hits for "一ノ瀬颯" on Google News, such as this article via Oricon that was run in the Asahi Shimbun, Tokushima Shimbun, and elsewhere just 3 days ago. He is the lead in both a TV show and a movie that was spun directly off from it, so it's a bit unclear whether that would be sufficient for WP:NACTOR. Dekimasuよ! 06:43, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. As usual, source hunting is more difficult if you out every scrap through the translator... thousands of hits could be triggered by the same press release, and it would be really hard to notice from the search result report alone :/ That article doesn't strike me as more than minimal coverage either, I must admit. Would be handy to have a Japanese-savvy person do a trawl. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:26, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I didn't make this clear, but I am Japanese-savvy. I read the article, I didn't put it through machine translation. Dekimasuよ! 04:48, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article you linked is a fairly trivial interview, can you find anything better? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:23, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Three-page interview here. Dekimasuよ! 04:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, all right - should have guessed from the name :) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:50, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Kishiryu Sentai Ryusoulger (since that is currently his only major role up to this point) unless the keep arguemnts are strong enough. Btw I would like @Elmidae: to refer to WP:NONENG and WP:TRANSCRIPTION. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 23:30, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I am entirely conversant with the fact that non-English sources are acceptable. That does not make them easier to check under circumstances such as these. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:24, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect is a good suggestion and I am changing my vote accordingly, but the insinuation that Elmidae is unaware of WP:NONENG borders on insulting. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:52, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: My mistake. I'll try to make sure it does not happen again. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 00:21, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.