Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girlfriend experience (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 02:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Girlfriend experience

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism that fails WP:NEO and WP:NAD, since of course "Wikipedia is not a dictionary, phrasebook, or a slang, jargon or usage guide." This article is a textbook case, discussing coined terms and phrases, perhaps suitable for Wiktionary but not Wikipedia. (Previous AFD in 2007 was of a different deletion era and 2012 was discussion about references, not policy.) -- Wikipedical (talk) 07:14, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a widely use phrase and a topic far more notable then many articles here like Meg McGuffin. Legacypac (talk) 07:42, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The notability of another article has nothing to do with this deletion discussion. The article fails WP:NEO and WP:NAD. Nothing you have said rebuts that. -- Wikipedical (talk) 02:52, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Legacypac, and rewrite. It currently looks like an essay. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:43, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The article fails policy. An article consisting of definitions and neologisms are forbidden, no matter how it's structured. -- Wikipedical (talk) 02:52, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.