Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GN-001 Gundam Exia (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure) the last AfD was an allmost unanimous keep and this one seems to be headed the same way. Icewedge (talk) 23:35, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GN-001 Gundam Exia

This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 15:30, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Main mobile suit of Gundam 00 series, notable as RX-87-2 Gundam (from original series), MSZ-006 Z Gundam (from Z Gundam), XXXG-00W0 Wing Zero Custom (from Gundam Wing) and GAT-X105 Strike Gundam (from Gundam SEED). Your re-debut in second season is iconic. Zero Kitsune (talk) 02:51, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep The nominator's copy-pasted rationale is wrong on all points. As was shown on the previous AfD, only 2 weeks ago, there is ample independant sourcing, notabilty is asserted at the beginning of the article, and one of the first things mentioned is an out-of-universe example of influence. Edward321 (talk) 04:54, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep It's a notable Gundam from Gundam 00. Important fictional vehicles are notable, such as X-Wing, and Variable Fighters. Exia is no different. ScienceApe (talk) 05:10, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keeep per everything in the first afd. I'm sure TNN was too busy with his disruptive copypasta nominations to actually bother to read the consensus established there. 76.116.247.15 (talk) 18:08, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.