Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G5 Entertainment (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

G5 Entertainment

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no source corresponding to NCROP and WP. The THREE rule falsifies the page as there are not two or three really independent and reliable non-routine in-depth sources. Prinokta (talk) 22:07, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Sweden. Shellwood (talk) 22:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:33, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Plenty of Swedish articles about the company. I've added "G5 spelbar på nytt" from Affärsvärlden and "Aktiespararna kritiska mot anonymt ägande i G5 – ”en unik situation”" from Dagens Industri and a few others. Affärsvärlden alone seems to have spent six pages on the company in one single issue in November 2021. Looking in the Swedish newspaper archive, there's sustained, non-trivial interest in the company. /Julle (talk) 02:25, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Clearly passes WP: ORG. Objecting seriously the nominator, I can find WP: SIGCOV especially the first source from a notable & verifiable news source Svenska Dagbladet Otuọcha (talk) 20:58, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't also understand what you meant by not finding reliable coverage. Per WP:THREE, the first and almost of not all seems reliable and verifiable as most of them in Wikipedia are considered not blog. Otuọcha (talk) 21:01, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This may be useful also Otuọcha (talk) 21:06, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Multiple pieces from both Swedish business and games industry media. Coverage from Affärsvärlden, Pocket Gamer, analyst coverage from redeye.se. Note: this article appears to be the repeated target of disruptive deletion attempts from very new users, and I would advocate a WP:SEMI if kept. It's been AFDed twice, CSDed, and draftified in three months. ~ A412 ^talk! 21:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.