Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foodtubes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 06:14, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Foodtubes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unrealized concept with minimal RS coverage. –dlthewave ☎ 19:17, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Verging on self (company) promotion, only two of 5 sources appear to be marginally reliable, remainder are original research. None of the "team" appear to be notable. On an off-topic note I live in Croydon and I can say I have never heard of such a concept. Nightfury 15:23, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unambiguous promotional article. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 17:12, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as promotional article, No evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 21:01, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete currently proposed. Yet to achieve notability. Sdmarathe (talk) 16:36, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article is good and may soon be notable, so it should be preserved somewhere. I'm in favor of Draftifying until notability is achieved. Would hate to see this article go to waste. Redditaddict6 9 03:47, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.