Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diu College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ansh 666 05:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diu College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failing WP:ORG and WP:GNG Arthistorian1977 (talk) 21:31, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This is a page of an educational institution. Any educational institution is notable even if it is a single room; as it helps to increase the human knowledge. It is not the page of some supersticious temple or church. It is a newly established college in an island and also only one college in that small island. Third party source of this article is also available in the references; in the pdf of Saurashtra University affiliated college list. Thus I think this article is suitable for wikipedia.--Soumitrahazra (talk) 25 September 2017

Comment Absolutely not, per Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Schools, all universities, colleges and schools, including high schools, middle schools, primary (elementary) schools, and schools that only provide a support to mainstream education must satisfy either this guideline (WP:ORG) or the general notability guideline, or both. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 22:18, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 22:50, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 22:50, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 22:50, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a degree-awarding institution per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 23:21, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 23:21, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as this is amply enough for WP:V, which is the only relevant pillar policy here and that alone is notable. SwisterTwister talk 04:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it was demonstrated that it exists and not a hoax, which is the only thing that matters for ~~secondary schools~~ degree awarding institution. --Muhandes (talk) 05:49, 26 September 2017 (UTC) ; edited 13:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus states that secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist. — Za wl 11:10, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, the term "secondary schools" was inappropriate and corrected. I think the message was understood even if the wrong term was used. --Muhandes (talk) 13:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The consensus is that pretty much all secondary and post-secondary educational institutions are notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
KeepIs a recognised college affiliated to the Saurashtra University degree-awarding institution.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.