Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Naughton (producer) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per consensus and per CSD G4. Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:48, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

David Naughton (producer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deleted two days ago at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2010_October_6#David_Naughton_.28producer.29 This page fails per WP:BAND (points 1 - 12, with special reference to the exceptions listed in Point 1. ), WP:COMPOSER, to credibly demonstrate the importance or notability of the subject for an article in the Wikipedia. Subject is a minor auxiliary musician and producer on two home-produced records. The references provided fail to meet the criteria per WP:RS for reliable sources. No third party articles articles about the subject have been located. The subject has not received significant coverage, and none of the records have featured in high positions of the national charts or received gold records. The subject does not appear to have made a significant solo career.

ref 1:The subjects name simply appears in a long list of other names who are vaguely thanked without any mention for what. The article is not about the subject and the source is a catalogue entry of basic product information.
ref 2: is a fleeting mention. The article is not about the subject and the source is a minor record review web site.
ref :3 the subject is listed as an 'also ran' (not a permanent band member). The article is not about the subject , and appears on an artist's (Duffy) self-designed, dself-published web site
ref 4: the subject is fleetingly mentioned on this Japanese language only site, as the producer of a home-recrdin of a record by Duffy. The article is not about the subject .
ref 5: the subject is listed along with other collaborators on a record that is listed on what appears to be a free music download site. The entry is not about the subject. Kudpung (talk) 14:24, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Kudpung (talk) 02:50, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Kudpung (talk) 03:05, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nom makes a very convincing and thorough argument above. Sources are shaky, seems to be a re-added version of an article that was just deleted. Although I think that the guy has a good career going, without the coverage in reliable sources to back it up - it really doesn't fit WP:N. Addionne (talk) 14:30, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's hard to find sources given the interference of David Naughton (actor), but credits do not make someone notable, I'm afraid. Fails WP:GNG and the others. Bigger digger (talk) 15:46, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt, this was properly deleted a few days ago. --Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 01:47, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there, I understand your concerns. As you all suggest, it is difficult to find any concrete sources. I have found artists on wikipedia who have named him as their producer but outside sources, other than album credits as an engineer are difficult to find. I'll have one more look tomorrow. Thanks for your help and consideration. (Jonkiryu (talk) 14:55, 20 October 2010 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.