Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collinson Grant (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Collinson Grant

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Title previously deleted at afd [1] with the same issues as it has now - small consulting firm that fail WP:CORPDEPTH Legacypac (talk) 20:40, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 23:07, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 23:07, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete perhaps as none of the listed coverage is convincing enough for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 00:13, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:13, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:46, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lack of coverage from independent sources. Either the sources are not independent, or, as in the case of the nenspaper stories, the company is mentioned for its role and is not the subject being covered by the story. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:41, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.