Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cliffjumper (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Procedural Keep. The last AFD on this article was closed 2 days ago. Do not immediately renominate it for another AFD discussion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cliffjumper

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looked at google for notability, very few credible mainstream outlets talk about the character specifically, the majority of the coverage about him is about his toys from fansites. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 15:16, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:27, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this article was nominated for deletion quite literally two days ago with a consensus to keep. Was there a proper reason that justified renominating this so soon? Pokelego999 (talk) 17:19, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep and procedural close per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cliffjumper_(2nd_nomination). - Indefensible (talk) 18:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Toys. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:24, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.