Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classic Army (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Classic Army

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company GraziePrego (talk) 00:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games, Companies, Firearms, and Hong Kong. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As written, fails WP:V and WP:NCOMPANY. Completly unreferenced - fancrufty entry for hobbists, not good enough for Wikipedia. PS. My BEFORE shows a few of their products are reviwed in this book but I am not seeing anything about the company itself. And the book is self-published so... fail. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: completely unsourced article and after a quick search I have been unable to find any sources to meet WP:CORP. Jtrrs0 (talk) 16:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unfiltered WP:PROMO about something specialist and with a small purchase base. Nate • (chatter) 22:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as seems unlikely to meet WP:GNG, let alone WP:NCORP. ProQuest turns up only a couple of hits which turn out to be passing mentions in trade journals. Article serves as nothing more than a product catalog at this point; it managed to survive with zero references for nearly 16 years. Cielquiparle (talk) 13:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.Dejaqo (talk) 20:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't pass wp:gng Big Money Threepwood (talk) 05:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.